top of page

CRITICAL MINERALS AROUND THE WORLD

WHAT YOU CAN EXPECT 

The transition from fossil fuels to low-carbon energy sources will depend on critical minerals. The consumption of these minerals could increase sixfold by 2050, according to one scenario by the International Energy Agency. In that world, the trade in energy-related resources will consist largely of critical minerals rather than oil and natural gas. By value, this market could top $400 billion, exceeding the value of all the coal extracted in 2020

To begin with, it is important to understand that two applications could drive three-fourths of the demand for critical minerals in 2050: electricity networks and batteries, chiefly for electric vehicles. Half of the total projected demand in 2050 is for copper and a quarter is split between nickel and graphite. Then come lithium, manganese, and cobalt. In terms of value, copper accounts for a third of the total in 2050, lithium and nickel each account for almost a quarter each, graphite 10 percent, and cobalt 7 percent.

Of course, these are just forecasts. But they reveal important trends and realities. Copper is by far the most valuable mineral. Copper, lithium, and nickel will account for over 80 percent of the market value in 2050. The production of each mineral is concentrated, but the major producers differ by commodity. The largest copper producer is Chile (40 percent of the total), Peru is second (11 percent), and China is third (9 percent). Australia produced half of the world’s lithium in 2020, Chile 22 percent, and China 17 percent. The top nickel producer is Indonesia (30 percent), followed by the Philippines (13 percent) and Russia (11 percent). Also on the list are countries such as Cuba (cobalt), Argentina and Brazil (lithium), and New Caledonia (nickel). This map is different than the impression one gets from headlines that overfocus on one or two countries and commodities.

This does not mean that other critical minerals—cobalt, manganese, graphite, or rare earths—are not important, only that context matters. Cobalt often dominates discussions about critical minerals, but in 2050, the value of cobalt could be lower than copper today and trivial relative to commodities like oil and gas today. Even the DRC earns more from copper exports today than from cobalt, despite being the world’s bigger cobalt producer. This is not a reason to ignore cobalt, but to ensure that conversations do not always devolve to cobalt and the DRC.

Importance of Critical Minerals

2023 FINAL CRITICAL MATERIALS LIST BY EUROPEAN COMMISSION (STRATEGIC RAW MATERIALS IN RED)

Aluminium / 

Bauxite 

Antimony

Arsenic

Baryte

Beryllium 

Bismuth 

Boron/Borate 

Cobalt

Coking Coal

Feldspar

Fluorspar

Gallium

Germanium

Hafnium

Helium

Heavy Rare Earth Elements

Lithium

Light Rare Earth Elements

Magnesium

Manganese

Natural Graphite

Niobium

Platinum Group Metals

Phosphate Rock

Phosphorus

Scandium

Silicon Metal

Strontium

Tantalum

Titanium Metal

Tungsten

Vanadium

Copper*

Nickel*

* Copper and nickel do not meet the CRM thresholds, but are included as Strategic Raw Materials.

AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL MINERALS

bottom of page